Q: Is it moral to value the present more than the future?

Why should we use “discounting” to decide how much to spend to avert future catastrophes like climate change? Given the high uncertainty around climate impacts, as well as high uncertainty about future economic stability, doesn’t inter-generational justice demand that we follow the precautionary principle and take the strongest action possible while we are able?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>